Michael Moura v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the affiant’s averments that “the claims in his affidavit are based on personal knowledge, that [the loan servicer] is a mortgage servicer, and that the note is held by [the loan servicer]” satisfied Rule 56(e)
• holding that the affiant’s averments that “the claims in his affidavit are based on personal knowledge, that [the loan servicer] is a mortgage servicer, and that the note is held by [the loan servicer]” satisfied Rule 56(e)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).