Skip to main content
· 10/24/2005

Michael L. Shakman and Paul M. Lurie v. City of Chicago

Citations

  • 426 F.3d 925
  • 63 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 334
  • 23 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1124
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 22944
  • 2005 WL 2713775

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Institutional reform litigation, and consent decrees attendant to that litigation, involve considerations of public interest and federalism that are not present in the run-of-the-mill civil case.”
  • “the protections contained in the 1972 Consent Decree … will remain in full force regardless”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffey, Ripple, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.