· 10/24/2005
Michael L. Shakman and Paul M. Lurie v. City of Chicago
Citations
- 426 F.3d 925
- 63 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 334
- 23 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1124
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 22944
- 2005 WL 2713775
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Institutional reform litigation, and consent decrees attendant to that litigation, involve considerations of public interest and federalism that are not present in the run-of-the-mill civil case.”
- “the protections contained in the 1972 Consent Decree … will remain in full force regardless”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coffey, Ripple, Kanne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.