Michael Knight v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that certain “actions brought pursuant to [§ 1983] are governed by [Hawaii]’s statute of limitations”
• holding that the normal discovery rule of accrual applies to a continuing impact from a past violation
• holding that, after the Supreme Court 18 Morgan decision, “little remains of the continuing violations doctrine[, e]xcept for a 19 limited exception for hostile work environment claims”
• holding that, after the Supreme Court Morgan decision, “little remains of the 12 continuing violations doctrine, [e]xcept for a limited exception for hostile work 13 environment claims”
• explaining that the Ninth Circuit has “consistently refused to apply the [continuing violations doctrine] to rescue individualized claims that are otherwise time-barred”
• explaining that the Ninth Circuit has “consistently refused to apply the systematic branch to rescue individualized claims that are otherwise time-barred”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).