Skip to main content
· 10/6/2015

Michael Kitchen v. Daniel Heyns

Citations

  • 802 F.3d 873
  • 92 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1524
  • 2015 FED App. 0243P
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 17507
  • 2015 WL 5813366

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to exercise appellate jurisdiction when the lower court had “not yet reached final judgment”
  • “The two remedies have ‘quite different’ legal effects.” (quoting DirecTV, Inc. v. Leto, 467 F.3d 842, 845 (3d Cir. 2006))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boggs, Suhrheinrich, Sutton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.