Michael Kerschner Inc. v. Malone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• speeding conviction affirmed where prosecution presented evidence rebutting driver’s challenge to engineering studies underlying speed limit
• speeding conviction affirmed where prosecution presented evidence rebutting driver's challenge to engineering studies underlying speed limit
• defendant charged with speeding could prevail if the Commonwealth could furnish no justification for posting a 35 mph speed limit because the department of transportation could not set speed limits arbitrarily

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).