Skip to main content
· 6/28/1989

Michael Joseph Molloy v. Mark Wilson

Citations

  • 878 F.2d 313
  • 13 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1446
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 9275
  • 1989 WL 69683

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that we reverse “only upon a clear showing of abuse of discretion” (emphasis omitted)
  • setting forth the standard of review for construing a Rule 60(b) motion, and noting that Rule 60(b)(6) motions can only be brought for reasons other than those enumerated in subsections (1)–(5)
  • “An appeal from a denial of a Rule 60(b) motion brings up only the denial of the motion for review, not the merits of the underlying judgment.”
  • “[C]lause (6) and the preceding clauses are mutually exclusive; a motion 28 brought under clause (6
  • “An appeal from a denial of a Rule 60(b) motion brings up only the denial of the motion for review, not the merits of the underlying judgment.”
  • “An appeal from a denial of a Rule 60(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Poole, Beezer, Trott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.