· 9/25/1997
Michael Jerome ISREAL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles D. MARSHALL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Citations
- 125 F.3d 837
- 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7616
- 97 Daily Journal DAR 12273
- 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 26386
- 1997 WL 590071
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- assuming, without deciding, that this state-created right is a protected liberty interest
- \NJ o right to concurrency inheres in the Due Process Clause. . . .\
- \NJ o right to concurrency inheres in the Due Process Clause. . . .\
- \NJ o right to concurrency inheres in the Due Process Clause. . . .\
- \NJ o right to concurrency inheres in the Due Process Clause. . . .\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tashima, Thomas, Sedwick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.