Skip to main content
· 9/25/1997

Michael Jerome ISREAL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles D. MARSHALL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee

Citations

  • 125 F.3d 837
  • 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7616
  • 97 Daily Journal DAR 12273
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 26386
  • 1997 WL 590071

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • assuming, without deciding, that this state-created right is a protected liberty interest
  • \NJ o right to concurrency inheres in the Due Process Clause. . . .\
  • \NJ o right to concurrency inheres in the Due Process Clause. . . .\
  • \NJ o right to concurrency inheres in the Due Process Clause. . . .\
  • \NJ o right to concurrency inheres in the Due Process Clause. . . .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tashima, Thomas, Sedwick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.