MICHAEL J. WARNER v. UNITED STATES

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding the case to the trial court because ―even if the evidence may be sufficient to sustain appellant‘s conviction, it does not compel it‖ (brackets and internal quotation marks omitted)
• remanding the case to the trial court because ―even if the evidence may be sufficient to sustain appellant‘s conviction, it does not compel it‖ (brackets and internal quotation marks omitted)
• stating a “scheme or systematic course of conduct” “requires the commission of multiple acts”
• “A false promise need not be express to support a conviction of attempted theft by deception; it can be implicit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).