Michael J. Rothrock and Edelle Rothrock v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “despite the alleged nonconformance with certain AASHTO standards, the [Federal Highway Administration] is charged with balancing a mix of factors such as cost and safety. This is inherently a discretionary judgment involving the balancing of a mix of policy factors”
• noting the Secretary’s broad discretion in approving federal highway projects
• noting the Secretary’s broad discretion in approving federal highway projects
• no jurisdiction over cases involving discretionary function
• no jurisdiction over cases involving discretionary function

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).