Michael J. Rossi, Dba Internet movies.com v. Motion Picture Association of America Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “courts interpreting ... federal statutes have traditionally interpreted “good faith’ to ■ encompass a ' subjective standard”
• deciding on summary judgment that the defendant’s “compliance with the notice and takedown procedures detailed in the DMCA met Hawaii’s standards for justification
• noting that § 512(f) is “an expressly limited cause of action”
• setting forth that a section 512(f) cause of action is an “expressly limited cause of action for improper infringement notifications”
• “A copyright owner cannot be liable simply because an unknowing mistake is made, even if the copyright owner acted unreasonably in making the mistake.”
• liability for improper infringement notices un- der § 512(f) requires “a demonstration of some actual knowledge of misrepresentation on the part of the copyright owner”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).