Michael J. McNeil v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing standing in the context of likelihood of success on the merits
• “The precise scope of the ‘some connection’ requirement is still unsettled . . . .”
• “Our decisions are not a model of clarity on what ‘constitutes a sufficient connection to enforcement.’” (quoting City of Austin, 943 F.3d at 999)
• “Texas’s vote-by-mail statutes are administered, at least in the first instance, by local election officials.” (citing TEX. ELEC. CODE § 83.005)
• “Because the plaintiffs’ fundamental right is not at issue, McDonald directs us to review only for a rational basis . . . .”
• “Because the plaintiffs have pointed to nothing that outlines a relevant enforcement role for Governor Abbott, the plaintiffs’ injuries likely cannot be fairly traced to him.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).