Skip to main content
· 8/11/2022

Michael Helmstetter v. David Herzog

Citations

  • 44 F.4th 676

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the duty to defend depends on whether the complaint “stated facts which appeared to bring [the plaintiffs] claimed injury within the policy coverage”
  • indicating that the duty to defend depends on whether the complaint “stated facts which appeared to bring” the “claimed injury within the policy coverage.”
  • “[w]hen ... the complaint comprehends an injury which may be within the policy, we hold that the promise to defend includes it” [emphasis added]
  • \the duty to defend depends on whether the complaint in [the underlying] action stated facts that appear to bring [the plaintiff's] claims of damages within the policy coverage\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jackson-Akiwumi

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.