Michael Harvey Deharde v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a trial court’s discretion to impose an exceptional sentence includes discretion to impose concurrent sentences where consecutive sentences are presumptively called for
• holding a trial court's discretion to impose an exceptional 10 No. 31020-5-111 State v. Graham sentence includes discretion to impose concurrent sentences where consecutive sentences are presumptively called for
• noting whether RCW 9.94A.589(1)(b) allows for concurrent sentences “is a question we have not directly addressed”
• declining to be influenced by dicta in judicial decision that encouraged the State’s argument
• noting whether RCW 9.94A.589(l)(b) allows for concurrent sentences \is a question we have not directly addressed\
• reversing trial court for failure to consider an exceptional sentence when sentencing multiple serious violent felonies under RCW 9.94A.589(l)(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).