Skip to main content
· 11/30/2004

Michael Harrison v. Administrative Review Board, U.S. Department of Labor, Roadway Express, Inc., Intervenor

Citations

  • 390 F.3d 752
  • 2005 CCH OSHD 32,738
  • 22 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 43
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 24684
  • 2004 WL 2712431

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • a plaintiff’s complaint regarding a yard horse is not a protected activity under the STAA because yard horses are not commercial motor vehicles and, thus, complaints regarding them “would not ‘relate[ ] to a violation of a commercial motor vehicle safety regulation’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leval, Calabresi, Rakoff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.