California Court of Appeal· 5/7/1987
Michael H. v. Gerald D.
Citations
- 191 Cal. App. 3d 995
- 236 Cal. Rptr. 810
- 1987 Cal. App. LEXIS 1699
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- interest of putative father in establishing his paternity of child conclusively presumed legitimate outweighed by State interest in upholding family integrity
- interest of putative father in establishing his paternity of child conclusively presumed legitimate outweighed by State interest in upholding family integrity
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Arabian
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Michael H. v. Gerald D.Supreme Court· 1989-08-30· cited 719×
- Ex Parte PresseSupreme Court of Alabama· 1989-09-29· cited 143×
- In Re Heather B.California Court of Appeal· 1992-09-14· cited 67×
- People v. HolifieldCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1988-11-04· cited 42×
- People v. BallardCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1988-07-29· cited 22×
- Susan H. v. JACK S.California Court of Appeal· 1994-12-19· cited 16×
- Simmons v. ComerWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1993-12-13· cited 15×
- J.O.J., Sr. v. R.R.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2004-07-16· cited 15×
- Fuss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1991-03-14· cited 14×
- Guardianship of Ethan S.California Court of Appeal· 1990-07-05· cited 13×
- In Re Melissa G.California Court of Appeal· 1989-08-31· cited 13×
- People v. SiravoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1993-07-27· cited 13×
- C.A. v. C.P.California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2018-11-13· cited 8×
- In re J.S.V.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1988-06-13· cited 6×
- Henne v. WrightD. Nebraska· 1989-05-03· cited 4×
- Shasta County Department of Social Services v. Jay B.California Court of Appeal· 1992-09-14· cited 3×
- McFarlin v. Fermin G.California Court of Appeal· 1989-08-31· cited 1×
- Joj, Sr. v. RrCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2004-07-16
- In the Matter of JSVMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1988-06-13
- C.A. v. C.P.California Court of Appeal· 2018-11-13
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1972-04-03· cited 5,889×
- Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court· 1983-06-27· cited 1,333×
- Chern v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-01-23· cited 192×
- Kusior v. SilverCalifornia Supreme Court· 1960-08-12· cited 134×
- Sprecher v. Adamson CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1981-12-07· cited 123×
- Brockman v. South CarolinaW.D. Pennsylvania· 1975-06-09· cited 119×
- In Re Lisa R.California Supreme Court· 1975-03-03· cited 109×
- Tresemer v. BarkeCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1978-11-22· cited 69×
- Frazier, Dame, Doherty, Parrish & Hanawalt v. Boccardo, Blum, Lull, Niland, Teerlink & BellCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1977-06-02· cited 59×
- Guardianship of Phillip B.California Court of Appeal· 1983-01-25· cited 54×
- Michelle W. v. Ronald W.California Supreme Court· 1985-08-05· cited 47×
- Sacramento County Welfare Department v. Victor R.California Supreme Court· 1975-03-03· cited 45×
- Estate of CorneliousCalifornia Supreme Court· 1984-01-26· cited 35×
- Vincent B. v. Joan R.California Court of Appeal· 1981-12-08· cited 27×
- El Rio Oils Ltd. v. Pacific Coast Asphalt Co.California Court of Appeal· 1949-12-20· cited 26×
- Osmond v. Ewap, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1984-03-28· cited 22×
- Stephen B. v. Sharyne B.California Court of Appeal· 1981-10-14· cited 17×
- Burg v. Municipal Court for the Santa Clara Judicial District of Santa Clara CountySupreme Court· 1984-05-14· cited 9×
- Vincent B. v. Joan R.Supreme Court· 1982-10-04· cited 3×
- El Rio Oils (Canada) Ltd. v. Pacific Coast Asphalt Co.Supreme Court· 1950-10-16· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.