Michael G. v. Commissioner of Correction
Citations
- 214 Conn. App. 358
Syllabus
Pursuant to statute (§ 52-470 (d) (1)), when a habeas petitioner files a subsequent petition for a writ of habeas corpus more than two years after the date on which judgment on a prior habeas petition challenging the same conviction is deemed final, there is a rebuttable presumption that the filing of the subsequent petition has been delayed without good cause. The petitioner, who had been convicted of the crimes of sexual assault in the first degree and risk of injury to a child, filed a third petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Because the third petition was filed beyond the two year time limit for subsequent petitions set forth in § 52-470 (d) (1), the habeas court, upon the request of the respondent Commissioner of Correction, issued an order to show cause why the petition should be permitted to proceed and scheduled an evidentiary hearing on the issue. Prior to the show cause hearing, the petitioner moved to disqualify the habeas judge on the ground that he had presided over the petitioner's first habeas trial and that his comments related to the credibility of the petitioner's testimony in that case would create the appearance of impropriety if he were to preside over the present case. The habeas court denied the petitioner's motion for disqualification. At the show cause hearing, the petitioner testified that he had filed a timely second habeas petition, but it was withdrawn prior to trial on the advice of his counsel and that his counsel had advised him to wait at least sixty days before filing another petition to avoid the suspicion of the court. The habeas court dismissed the third habeas petition as untimely, concluding that the petitioner failed to demonstrate good cause for the nearly ten month delay in filing the petition and that the withdrawal of the second petition was strategically filed to manipulate or delay proceeding to trial. Thereafter, the habeas court denied the petitioner's petition for certification to appeal, and the petitioner appeale
Judges: Alvord; Cradle; Eveleigh
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.