Skip to main content
· 2/21/2024

Michael Fisten v. Julie Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming Travel Act conviction as applied to a \kickback scheme\ that violated state law
  • jury charge required finding that defendant devised scheme “to defraud [certain companies] of money”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.