Michael Fereras-Alcantara v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding trust account violations alone did not provide sufficient evidence attorney charged objectively unreasonable fee
• finding a violation of rule 32:8.4(c) when an attorney failed to inform his client the bankruptcy court had terminated his bankruptcy practice
• finding rule 32:8.1 (b) violation when attorney was aware of the Board’s request and failed to comply
• finding an attorney competent but neglectful and, after considering other violations, imposing a one-year suspension
• finding a violation of rule 32:8.4(c) when an attorney failed to inform his client the bankruptcy court had terminated his bankruptcy practice
• imposing one-year suspension where attorney violated a bankruptcy court order, committed trust account violations, and neglected several clients

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).