Skip to main content
· 12/23/1998

Michael Earl Sexton v. James B. French, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina

Citations

  • 163 F.3d 874
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 31844
  • 1998 WL 892756

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that Lockhart requires an ineffectiveness claimant to demonstrate that his trial was \fundamentally unfair or unreliable\ in order to satisfy the Strickland prejudice prong
  • explaining decisions of “trial strategy and tactics” including “what stipulations should be made” are left to counsel
  • whether to file a motion to suppress “is a classic tactical decision” for which consent from the defendant was not required
  • whether to file a motion to suppress \is a classic tactical decision\ for which consent from the defendant was not required
  • defendant's claim that \trial counsel failed to inform him of his right to testify or ... forced him to testify must satisfy the two-prong test established in Strickland\
  • trial counsel has burden of informing defendant of nature and existence of right

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkinson, Hamilton, Motz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.