Michael E. Stuart v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding to the Board to determine whether the plaintiff should have been referred to an MEB
• stating that, under Army Regulation 40-501 ¶ 3-3(d), “if a physician identified a soldier with a medical condition that did not meet retention standards, the physician was charged with referring that soldier to the Physical Disability Evaluation System, and [an MEB] was mandatory”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).