· 5/5/1980

Michael Dyndul v. Irena Dyndul

Citations

620 F.2d 409
17 V.I. 623
1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 17847

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

\‘[F]inality’ for purposes of issue preclusion is a more ‘pliant’ concept than it would be in other contexts.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adams, Maris, Per Curiam, Sloviter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.