Michael Dunham Murphy v. Missouri Department of Corrections Winfrey Dickerson Dora B. Schriro Elijah Nagbe Steve Long Michael Kemna

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was not clear that a \total preclusion of group worship for [an alleged supremacist group]\ was the least restrictive means
• recognizing that whether something “is a sincerely held religious belief is a factual determination”
• recognizing that whether something “is a sincerely held religious belief is a factual determination”
• deciding “[a] regulation valid and neutral in other respects may be invalid if it is applied to the particular items in such a way that negates the legitimate concerns”
• stating that the court may only consider \admissible evidence\ and must \disregard portions of [. . .] affidavits and depositions that [. . .] purport[] to state legal conclusions as fact.\
• reemphasizing that “institutional security is ‘the most compelling government interest in a prison setting.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).