Michael Deiondre Bowen v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that determination as to whether there was adequate public sewage capacity for permitted use was not an attempt to impose requirement that applicant allocate available sewer capacity, although case did not involve WRPA
• concluding it was error to “substitut[e] . . . what it believed the [z]oning [o]rdinance should state for that which was actually legislated by the [t]ownship”
• stating applicant had to meet standard to establish that there were adequate services and utilities, in particular, public sewage capacity, for permitted use

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).