Michael D. Warburton v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding ALJ’s decision adequate where, although record did not contain precise diagnosis of claimant’s mental impairment, ALJ adequately captured effects of impairment in RFC determination
• ALJ’s failure to order additional mental examination not improper where record contained medical reports and testimony regarding claimant’s condition
• “We may not reverse the [agency’s] decision merely because substantial evidence supports a contrary outcome.”
• ALJ’s failure to order additional mental examination not improper where record contained medical reports and testimony regarding claimant’s condition
• \[w]e may not reverse the Commissioner's decision merely because substantial evidence supports a contrary outcome.\
• “We may not reverse the [agency’s] decision merely because substantial evidence supports a contrary outcome.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).