Michael D. Van Stan v. Fancy Colours & Company, Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming dismissal of intentional infliction of emotional distress claim based on allegations that the defendant terminated the plaintiff because of his disability and gave a pretextual reason for the termination
• \[P]ersonality conflicts and questioning of job performance are unavoidable aspects of employment.\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• employer's act of discharging plaintiff with bipolar disorder and providing an untrue reason for the discharge did not exceed all possible bounds of decency under an objective standard
• noting special deference to eviden‐ tiary rulings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).