Eleventh Circuit· 4/12/2007
Michael D. Porter v. Bob White
Citations
- 483 F.3d 1294
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 8373
- 2007 WL 1074714
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- § 1983 action based on a prosecutor’s failure to comply with Brady is barred because the prosecutor has absolute immunity
- “[Ijrrespective of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution,” “the prosecution is charged with a Brady violation” when “favorable, material evidence exclusively in the hands of the prosecution team fails to reach the defense.”
- “[W]e hold that mere USCA11 Case: 22-10886 Document: 45-1 Date Filed: 01/03/2024 Page: 13 of 15 22-10886 Opinion of the Court 13 officers enjoy the same absolute immunity as lay witnesses for their testimony at trial … or in front of the grand jury.” (citations omit- ted)
- citied favorably in Tennison, 570 F.3d at 1088
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Marcus, Altonaga
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Owens v. Baltimore City State's Attorneys OfficeFourth Circuit· 2014-09-24· cited 858×
- Haley v. City of BostonFirst Circuit· 2011-09-19· cited 804×
- Tennison v. City and County of San FranciscoNinth Circuit· 2009-06-23· cited 89×
- Drumgold v. CallahanFirst Circuit· 2013-01-31· cited 66×
- Nick C. Rhoades v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa· 2016-04-15· cited 45×
- Beverly Spencer v. Sheriff Jonathan BenisonEleventh Circuit· 2021-07-16· cited 43×
- Johnson v. City of CheyenneTenth Circuit· 2024-04-26· cited 18×
- Arnold v. McNeilM.D. Florida· 2009-03-31· cited 16×
- Jeffrey Moldowan v. Maureen FournierSixth Circuit· 2009-07-01· cited 16×
- United States v. Randall RobinsonEighth Circuit· 2016-01-05· cited 13×
- John Wayne Charleston v. Clint Allen, Criminal District Attorney of Cass CountyTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2012-10-15· cited 8×
- Moldowan v. City of WarrenSixth Circuit· 2009-07-23· cited 6×
- Jones v. YantaDistrict of Columbia· 2009-03-31· cited 6×
- Burgess v. Balt. Police Dep'tD. Maryland· 2018-03-09· cited 6×
- Madison Cnty. v. Evanston Ins. Co.N.D. Alabama· 2018-09-28· cited 6×
- Jones v. City of College Park, GAN.D. Georgia· 2007-09-28· cited 3×
- Jeffrey Clark v. Louisville-Jefferson Cnty. Metro Gov'tSixth Circuit· 2025-03-07· cited 2×
- Tennison v. SandersNinth Circuit· 2009-06-23
- United States v. Charles SchrodeSeventh Circuit· 2016-10-07
- Amended August 23, 2016 Nick C. Rhoades v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa· 2016-04-15
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court· 1978-06-06· cited 41,449×
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court· 1994-06-24· cited 15,294×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1986-01-21· cited 7,676×
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court· 1976-03-02· cited 7,274×
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-02-24· cited 7,003×
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court· 1981-05-18· cited 6,693×
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 6,537×
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court· 1998-05-26· cited 6,212×
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court· 1995-04-19· cited 6,003×
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court· 1979-06-26· cited 5,659×
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 4,383×
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court· 1990-02-27· cited 3,290×
- Brosseau v. HaugenSupreme Court· 2004-12-13· cited 2,748×
- Siegert v. GilleySupreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 2,725×
- Wilson v. LayneSupreme Court· 1999-05-24· cited 2,678×
- City of Los Angeles v. HellerSupreme Court· 1986-04-21· cited 2,104×
- Davidson v. CannonSupreme Court· 1986-01-21· cited 1,806×
- Kim D. Lee v. Luis FerraroEleventh Circuit· 2002-03-05· cited 1,276×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.