Michael D. Barrett and G. Lamar Crittenden, Jr. v. Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adding that this language “demands . . . the sort of relative, contextual judgment which looks to both the ends served by [the statute] and the overall state of affairs surrounding the transferor corporation and the challenged transfer itself”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).