Michael Cunningham v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a self-defense instruction should have been given “[bjecause there was conflicting evidence as to whether [the victim] behaved in a threatening manner”
• recognizing that “the mere display of a gun is not deadly force as a matter of law” (emphasis in original) (citing Carter v. State, 115 So. 3d 1031, 1037 n.3 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)); see also Howard v. State, 698 So. 2d 923, 925 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).