Michael Chambers, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Victoria Ingram, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the timing of a request for reimbursement of expert fees is not a bar to reimbursement
• litigant's post-judgment request for costs under Rule 26(b)(4)(C) was timely even though he never requested such costs at the time of deposition
• request was not untimely where the request for fees was included in the prevailing plaintiff’s bill of costs filed within 30 days of the district court's entry of judgment
• request was not untimely where the request for fees was included in the prevailing plaintiff's bill of costs filed within 30 days of the district court's entry of judgment
• “The advisory committee notes to Rule 26(b)(4)(C

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).