Michael Cavanaugh v. Larry Kincheloe Amos Reed

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Rule 8 72(b) requirement of specifically written objections does not apply to habeas corpus petitions filed 9 under 28 § U.S.C. 2254
• holding Washington state’s rule regarding a failure to object to a lack of proper foundation to admit prior convictions was procedural bar to review of underlying federal constitutional claim
• “Rule 72(b) does not apply to habeas corpus petitions filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254”
• “Rule 72(b) does not apply to habeas corpus petitions filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254.”
• “Rule 72(b) does not apply to 3 habeas corpus petitions filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254.”
• “Rule 72(b) does not apply to habeas corpus petitions filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).