Michael Cardiel v. Carrillo Family Trust

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that mere existence of inaccurate information in agency database was not concrete injury and noting plaintiffs’ alleged injuries resulted from “neither disclosure nor withholding of information”
• determining “prospect of future injury” was purely speculative when “nothing in the record indicates that anyone has recently accessed or used the information at issue”
• even if statute protects concrete interest, \the putative plaintiff\ must have \suffered a de facto injury resulting from the procedural violation\
• “[Plaintiffs] must demonstrate standing separately for each form of relief sought.” (quoting Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Env’t Servs. (TOC), Inc., 528 U.S. 167, 185 (2000))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).