Michael Bregman v. Steven Perles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that an essential element of an unjust enrichment claim is that plaintiff conferred a benefit on defendant
• stating that an essential 20 element of an unjust enrichment claim is that plaintiff conferred a benefit on defendant
• finding the defendants’ “enrichment became unjust[] when they unequivocally refused to compensate [the plaintiff] for the services he had performed” upon the understanding that he would be compensated
• finding unjust enrichment regardless of whether plaintiffs “labors got [defendants] across the goal line”
• “Because statute of limitations issues often depend on contested questions of fact, dismissal is appropriate only if the complaint on its face is conclusively time-barred.”
• “Because statute of limitations issues often depend on contested questions of fact, dismissal is appropriate only if the complaint on its 12 face is conclusively time-barred.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).