Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We recognize that [ ]Title VII is clearly remedial civil rights legislation . . . .”
• “We recognize that []Title VII is clearly remedial civil rights legislation . . . .”
• in “discrimination cases,” “the right at issue” is “the right to be free from discrimination”
• “Inasmuch as [the defendant] does not urge that we resolve the Eleventh Amendment questions before we decide the statutory contribution questions, conceptually, at least, we could hold that it has waived its Eleventh Amendment im- munity to that very limited extent.”
• “Inasmuch as [the defendant] does not urge that we resolve the Eleventh Amendment questions before we decide the statutory contribution questions, conceptually, at least, we could hold that it has waived its Eleventh Amendment immunity to that very limited extent.”
• ““[A] court may reserve judgment on Eleventh Amendment issues even when advanced by a state where it can resolve the case on other grounds and the prevailing party on the merits would be the same as the prevailing party if immunity were recognized.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).