Michael Bagby v. First Street Deli II, LLC, Kim Harker, and Alexis Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the “[ajcceptance ... of an invitation to participate in a plan, the necessary consequence of which, if carried out, is restraint of interstate commerce, is sufficient to establish unlawful conspiracy under the Sherman Act”
• discussing anticompetitive agreements among dealers and distributors of motion picture films to fix prices under § 1
• emphasizing a parallel change in the business procedure of competitors as evidence of collusion
• inferring agreement among film exhibitors where a movie distributor sent letters to each film exhibitor placing limitations on exhibition and advising that others were participating and that cooperation was essential
• emphasizing a parallel change in the business procedure of competitors as evidence of collusion
• “The pro- duction of weak evidence when strong is available can lead only to the conclusion that the strong would have been ad- verse”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).