Michael Austin v. Charles Healey, United States Marshal for the Eastern District of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that magistrate judges have jurisdiction over extradition certifications
• “[t]he evidence presented need only ‘support a reasonable belief that [the respondent] was guilty of the crime[s] charged.’”
• habeas review is not occasion for review of magistrate judge’s findings regarding credibility or weight of evidence
• ‘The evidence presemted need only support a reasonable belief that [Petitioner] was guilty of the crimes charged.”
• because the petitioner’s state habeas petition was not filed within the one-year period that commenced after the state criminal judgment became final under the AEDPA, it did not statutorily toll the limitation clock
• non-jurisdietional and non-constitutional arguments deemed to have been forfeited

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).