Michael Argenyi v. Creighton University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that university must provide reasonable auxiliary aids and services to partially deaf medical student to afford him opportunity equal to his nondisabled peers
• finding that there were issues of fact as to medical student’s effective communication claim under Title III based on medical school’s refusal to provide him with the auxiliary aids he requested as accommodations
• requiring defendant to adopt auxiliary aids that afford disabled individuals “equal opportunity to gain the same benefit”
• \Congress require[s] public accommodations ... to furnish reasonable ... services so that all individuals have an equal opportunity to gain 'a like' or 'equal' benefit.\
• “Since the ADA and Rehabilitation Act are ‘similar in substance,’ we treat the case law interpreting them as ‘interchangeable.’”
• a self-serving affidavit must be considered, but its particular factual allegations must also be scrutinized for independent documentary evidence to support them

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).