Michael Anthony Jewelers, Inc. v. Peacock Jewelry, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• entertaining fraud claim where plaintiff was alleged to have applied for copyright registration in its own name for designs originated by others and “willfully” omitted in its applications reference to any work from which its designs were copied or originated
• “antitrust claim relies heavily on charges of fraud and therefore ... must be scrutinized under Rule 9(b)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).