Michael Angelo MORALES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Arthur CALDERON, Warden, Respondent-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding “no discernible clear rule” for petitions filed outside the 90-day presumption of timeliness window before Clark
• including postcard denials in review of cases to determine procedural bar’s adequacy
• “Federal habeas review is not barred if the state decision fairly appears to rest primarily on federal law, or to be interwoven with the federal law” (internal quotation marks omitted).
• “Federal 2 habeas review is not barred if the state decision ‘fairly appears to rest primarily on federal law, or 3 to be interwoven with federal law.’” (quoting Coleman, 501 U.S. at 735

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).