Michael Amundsen v. The Chicago Park District, Rob O'connor, Kathy Dunlap, Marilyn Morales, and Peter Podgorski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]f the agreement is not overt, the alleged acts must be sufficient to raise the inference of mutual understanding ....’” '(quoting Kunik v. Racine Cnty., Wis., 946 F.2d 1574, 1580-81 (7th Cir.1991))
• “[I]n order to sustain a claim that the defendants conspired to deny the plaintiff his constitutional rights, ‘there must be allegations that the defendants directed themselves toward an unconstitutional action by virtue of a mutual understanding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).