Skip to main content
· 4/7/2004

Michael Allen Lambert v. Daniel McBride Superintendent

Citations

  • 365 F.3d 557
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 6658
  • 2004 WL 736876

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defense counsel’s failure to object to prosecutor’s impassioned closing arguments that arguably “pushed the bounds of zealous advocacy” did not constitute deficient performance
  • defense counsel’s failure to object to prosecutor’s impassioned closing arguments that arguably “pushed the bounds of zealous advocacy” did not constitute deficient performance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ripple, Kanne, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.