Michael A. Rosin v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that counsel’s “erroneous calculation of Rosin’s potential prison sentence” did not prejudice the defendant since there was no evidence the defendant “would have accepted a guilty plea”
• stressing that the record evidence that the defendant “had absolutely no interest in” pleading guilty contradicted his later claim that he would have done so
• “The district court is not required to grant a petitioner an evidentiary hearing if the § 2255 motion ‘and the files and records of the case conclusively show 2 Rule 8(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).