Michael A. LoRusso v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that failure to file transcript precludes review of evidentiary rulings or claims concerning sufficiency of the evidence
• noting that “[w]hen the record on appeal fails to include copies of the documents necessary to decide an issue on appeal, the Court of Appeals is unable to rule on that issue”
• ‘When the record on appeal fails to include copies of the documents necessary to decide an issue on appeal, the Court of Appeals is unable to rule on that issue.”
• “The appellant is responsible for insuring that all materials on which he [or she] seeks to rely are part of the record on appeal.”
• district court’s omission of particular language within an instruction is reviewed for abuse of discretion
• claims for evidentiary insufficiency not reviewable ■ on appeal where record incomplete

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).