Skip to main content
· 4/1/1976

Miceikis v. Field

Citations

  • 347 N.E.2d 320
  • 37 Ill. App. 3d 763
  • 1976 Ill. App. LEXIS 2251

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • a medical expert’s personal involvement as a defendant in a malpractice case was of “questionable relevance” when weighing the doctor’s testimony regarding the standard of care at issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McNAMARA

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.