Skip to main content
· 7/12/1976

Mianus River Preservation Committee v. Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency

Citations

  • 541 F.2d 899
  • 9 ERC 1174

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that in determining whether real estate transaction constitutes secur- ity, “promotional emphasis of the developer” is “[c]entral”
  • noting that the Supreme Court has declared that equitable tolling principles are “read into every federal statute of limitation,” subject to express contrary Congressional intent
  • stating that “It is entirely consistent with stated congressional objectives to define ‘sale’ in a real estate market as contract formation rather than contract discharge. Real estate payments are commonly not completed for decades.”
  • “[c]apital appreciation through development should be distinguished from a general increase in land values concurrent with neighborhood growth and improvements”
  • the plaintiff has the burden of establishing a factual basis for tolling the statute of limitations
  • the plaintiff has the burden of establishing a factual basis for tolling the statute of limitations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hays, Meskill, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.