MIAMI PHYSICAL THERAPY v. Savage

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• agreeing that certiorari is the proper remedy when the plaintiff did not comply with the presuit screening requirements
• stating that “the mere expense and inconvenience of litigation does not constitute harm sufficient to permit certiorari review, even if the order departs from the essential requirements of the law”
• applying Williams and holding that notice required by section 766.106 must be filed within statute of limitations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).