Miami Mds Company v. Federal Communications Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the subject permits to build a telecommunications facility were similar to a dredge-and-fill permit, which involved a “one-time activity” and would be “void on a specified date if the work was not completed by that date”
• “courts have routinely adhered to the general rule prohibiting 15 pro se plaintiffs from pursuing claims on behalf of others in a representative capacity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).