Skip to main content
· 8/15/1961

Miami Laundry Co. v. Sanitary Linen Service

Citations

  • 133 So. 2d 325

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • quoting, in part, Fidelity Bank v. Com. Marine and Gen. Assurance Co., 592 F.Supp. 513, 522 (E.D. Pa. 1984)
  • quoting, in part, Fidelity Bank v. Com. Marine and Gen. Assurance Co., 592 F.Supp. 513, 522 (E.D. Pa. 1984)
  • Superior Court unable to review prejudgment interest issue due to appellant’s failure to order trial transcript
  • Decisions of Commonwealth Court and lower federal courts not binding, but provide persuasive authority and guidance
  • “Recovery of prejudgment interest under this standard is a matter of law.”
  • internal citations, original brackets, footnotes omitted; some emphasis in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.