MIAMI DADE COLLEGE v. NADER+MUSEU I, LLLP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the internet is a “dynamic, multifaceted category of communication” and that there is “no basis for qualifying the level of First Amendment scrutiny that should be applied to this medium”
• holding that indecent speech en- compasses “large amounts of nonpornographic material with serious ed- ucational or other value”
• holding that sexual expression that is \indecent\ is protected by the First Amendment
• holding that a statute was not narrowly tailored because there were \less restrictive alternatives [that] would be at least as effective in achieving the legitimate purpose that the statute was enacted to serve\
• holding that sexual expression that is “indecent” is protected by the First Amendment
• holding that a statute was not narrowly tailored because there were “less restrictive alternatives [that] would be at least as effective in achieving the legitimate purpose that the statute was enacted to serve”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).