Mi Hyang v. Lynde

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming grant of new trial in part where parties’ experts agreed the defendant’s acts caused some of plaintiff’s injuries
• limiting new trial to minor injuries, which were only a portion of jury award not supported by record evidence
• limiting new trial to only a certain type of damages, and did not allow the plaintiff to get a “second bite at the apple” to prove other damages
• granting new trial on damages for minor injuries sustained by plaintiff where both parties’ medical experts agreed that minor injuries were caused in vehicle collisions at issue, disagreeing only as to cause of major injuries
• “Because it was conceded that Mrs. Shin suffered neck and back strain from the accident that lasted approximately six weeks, the jury ignored the uncontroverted medical testimony, and the verdict was against the weight of the evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).