M.H. Ex Rel. P.H. v. New York City Department of Education

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “only 17 of the IEP’s 85 short-term objectives contain an evaluation procedure, and, most importantly, not one of the academic short-term objectives mentions an evaluation procedure.”
• rejecting SRO’s conclusion as insufficiently reasoned and deferring to IHO’s conclusion that 6:1:1 placement “could not provide the 1:1 [placement] that constituted an appropriate education for P.H.”
• evaluating whether parents’ placement was least restrictive environment using the Newington test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).